SchindlersWord

the origin of humanity

personaldevelopment

Galileo Galilei

By In You

(born 460 years ago / died 382 years ago) is according to Wikipedia the father of astronomy, physics, and modern science.

A catholic word-user himself, Galileo’s work nevertheless angered his catholicist chiefs, the word-masters.

That was enough for the catholic inquisition instituted by the word-masters to decide Galileo’s work contradicted the only book they claimed to be reading — a book of more stories than you’re able to remember, also known as Bible.

So 409 years ago, Galileo was declared “vehemently suspect of heresy”, forced to recant and spend the rest of his 27 years under house arrest.

What cantare — to chant, to sing — has got to do with recant, only the grammarians know.
It will remain their secret for longer than the word-users will ever know.

Back to Galilei.

How does his story end?

I don’t know (I wasn’t around when Galileo was) but making more sense than his catholicist chiefs ever will, Galileo defended his use of his common senses with:

.

“I do not feel obliged to believe the same God that has endowed us with senses, has intended us to forgo their use.”

#education #personaldevelopment #ScienceVsDogma #word

Galileo Galilei

GALILEO GALILEI

(born 460 years ago / died 382 years ago) is according to Wikipedia the father of astronomy, physics, and modern science.

A catholic word-user himself, Galileo’s work nevertheless angered his catholicist chiefs, the word-masters.

That was enough for the catholic inquisition instituted by the word-masters to decide Galileo’s work contradicted the only book they claimed to be reading — a book of more stories than you’re able to remember, also known as Bible.

So 409 years ago, Galileo was declared “vehemently suspect of heresy”, forced to recant and spend the rest of his 27 years under house arrest.

What cantare — to chant, to sing — has got to do with recant, only the grammarians know.
It will remain their secret for longer than the word-users will ever know.

Back to Galilei.

How does his story end?

I don’t know (I wasn’t around when Galileo was) but making more sense than his catholicist chiefs ever will, Galileo defended his use of his common senses with:

.

“I do not feel obliged to believe the same God that has endowed us with senses, has intended us to forgo their use.”

#education #personaldevelopment #ScienceVsDogma #word

William Tyndale

By In You

Everybody knows

  • In the beginning is the word.
  • A word by any other word is a word.
  • A word by itself doesn’t do or have (anything).
  • For a word to do or have (anything) takes a word-user first.

No one knows

  • How a word is a word in the beginning.
  • What word-users must do to make a word do or have (anything).
  • Must we, the word-users, create, invent, pull out of a hat, translate, produce out of thin air, or by any other means make words exist?

English words

How did English words in the beginning become the beginning of word-users in England?
Nobody knows.

However, one of the word-users credited for making modern english words exist to begin with is William Tyndale together with his namesake, William Shakespeare. But Shakespeare merely completed the English word making job after William Tyndale aged 43 was one cold morning led by a group of catholicists from his prison cell to a nearby bridge, tied to a stake, wood piled around him, and burned to death.

Tyndale’s crime? He dared translate the book of more stories than you can remember, also known as Bible, from Hebrew and Greek words to English words.

27 years younger than Tyndale, William Shakespeare, while doing what he famously did, is credited for making up some 1,700 English words. But unlike Tyndale, this allowed Shakespeare to stay out of trouble with the catholicists and he died aged 53 of causes now considered natural. What the causes were back then isn’t known because death certificates hadn’t been invented yet.

TAKEAWAY

Though the burning at stakes of wordless animals is okay all over the world, the burning of word-users at stakes is illegal in many countries today.

On the downside, you can never be sure which country you’re in.

To avoid Tyndale’s fate, I therefore recommend avoid making any religionists angry, especially religionists of a certain type.

Religionists of a certain type may not burn you at a stake now, considered old school, but as you know from the evening news, their possibilities are infinite.

#futurism #personaldevelopment #TyndaleAndShakespeare #word

William Tyndale

WILLIAM TYNDALE

Everybody knows

  • In the beginning is the word.
  • A word by any other word is a word.
  • A word by itself doesn’t do or have (anything).
  • For a word to do or have (anything) takes a word-user first.

No one knows

  • How a word is a word in the beginning.
  • What word-users must do to make a word do or have (anything).
  • Must we, the word-users, create, invent, pull out of a hat, translate, produce out of thin air, or by any other means make words exist?

English words

How did English words in the beginning become the beginning of word-users in England?
Nobody knows.

However, one of the word-users credited for making modern English words exist to begin with is William Tyndale together with his namesake, William Shakespeare. But Shakespeare merely completed the English word making job after William Tyndale aged 43 was one cold morning led by a group of catholicists from his prison cell to a nearby bridge, tied to a stake, wood piled around him, and burned to death.

Tyndale’s crime? He dared translate the book of more stories than you can remember, also known as Bible, from Hebrew and Greek words to English words.

27 years younger than Tyndale, William Shakespeare, while doing what he famously did, is credited for making up some 1,700 English words. But unlike Tyndale, this allowed Shakespeare to stay out of trouble with the catholicists and he died aged 53 of causes now considered natural. What the causes were back then isn’t known because death certificates hadn’t been invented yet.

TAKEAWAY

Though the burning at stakes of wordless animals is okay all over the world, the burning of word-users at stakes is illegal in many countries today.

On the downside, you can never be sure which country you’re in.

To avoid Tyndale’s fate, I therefore recommend avoid making any religionists angry, especially religionists of a certain type.

Religionists of a certain type may not burn you at a stake now, considered old school, but as you know from the evening news, their possibilities are infinite.

#futurism #personaldevelopment #TyndaleAndShakespeare #word

Martin Luther

By In You

Martin Luther (born 541 years ago / died 478 years ago) was a catholic priest that re-formed the rituals of his catholic religion.

For this, he got condemned as an outlaw and excommunicated by his chiefs, the word-masters.

Belief

There is no such thing as a non-believer. Word-masters and word-users alike cannot exist without belief. We believe anything whether we want it or not, and what we believe plays no role in it.

Did Martin Luther knew this?

I don’t know, but I know his chiefs, the word-masters, knew.

I guess as far as Martin Luther is concerned, he saw no alternative to believe in a fictional character called God, and the only one available to him at the time, in Germany, was the one his chiefs had earlier dreamt up for him, in Italy.

So he decided to dream up his own, called it Lutheran, and de-facto founded his own religion today known under names such as reformist, protestantist, christianist, or evangelist, to name a few.

TAKEAWAY

Martin Luther exchanged one religion for another.

That’s a dumb idea beyond the shadow of a doubt. Tough a common mistake, it doesn’t make it intelligent.

Religion has been and continues to be the most divisive force since the beginning of words, for which the proof is in the pudding.

In the 4.65 billion years Before Words

The sun, the moon, the stars, the energy, the electricity, the fire, the air, the earth, the water, the plants, and the animals have not been raist, buddhist, hinduist, jewist, catholicist, protestantist, mayanist, islamist, or other words religions disguise in or under, for these simple reasons:

  • Before Words, words didn’t exist.
  • The sun, moon, stars, energy, electricity, fire, air, earth, water, plants, and wordless animals have better things to do, such as being each on their journey in perfect harmony.
  • For a tadpole to shed his body to find a frog within, that tadpole didn’t/doesn’t have to go to school to learn words first.
  • If water were religious, it would be deeply divided, hate itself, and fight religious wars. But water is the contrary. It has the perfect memory and always finds back to itself.

In the 13,750 years After Words

The word-masters have been preaching to the word-users for thousands of years with no end in sight that everything is divided.

We’re divided from animals and from nature because we’re created in a fictional character’s image instead, they want you to believe.

  • “Currently, man is waging war against nature. If he wins, he is lost”. – Hubert Reeves (not known as Saint Hubert)
  • “Wrong is wrong even if everybody is doing it. Right is right even if no one is doing it.” – Augustine of Hippo (also known as Saint Augustine)

#education #personaldevelopment #ReligionAndBelief #word

Martin Luther

MARTIN LUTHER

Martin Luther (born 541 years ago / died 478 years ago) was a catholic priest that re-formed the rituals of his catholic religion.

For this, he got condemned as an outlaw and excommunicated by his chiefs, the word-masters.

Belief

There is no such thing as a non-believer. Word-masters and word-users alike cannot exist without belief. We believe anything whether we want it or not, and what we believe plays no role in it.

Did Martin Luther knew this?

I don’t know, but I know his chiefs, the word-masters, knew.

I guess as far as Martin Luther is concerned, he saw no alternative to believe in a fictional character called God, and the only one available to him at the time, in Germany, was the one his chiefs had earlier dreamt up for him, in Italy.

So he decided to dream up his own, called it Lutheran, and de-facto founded his own religion today known under names such as reformist, protestantist, christianist, or evangelist, to name a few.

TAKEAWAY

Martin Luther exchanged one religion for another.

That’s a dumb idea beyond the shadow of a doubt. Tough a common mistake, it doesn’t make it intelligent.

Religion has been and continues to be the most divisive force since the beginning of words, for which the proof is in the pudding.

In the 4.65 billion years Before Words

The sun, the moon, the stars, the energy, the electricity, the fire, the air, the earth, the water, the plants, and the animals have not been raist, buddhist, hinduist, jewist, catholicist, protestantist, mayanist, islamist, or other words religions disguise in or under, for these simple reasons:

  • Before Words, words didn’t exist.
  • The sun, moon, stars, energy, electricity, fire, air, earth, water, plants, and wordless animals have better things to do, such as being each on their journey in perfect harmony.
  • For a tadpole to shed his body to find a frog within, that tadpole didn’t/doesn’t have to go to school to learn words first.
  • If water were religious, it would be deeply divided, hate itself, and fight religious wars. But water is the contrary. It has the perfect memory and always finds back to itself.

In the 13,750 years After Words

The word-masters have been preaching to the word-users for thousands of years with no end in sight that everything is divided.

We’re divided from animals and from nature because we’re created in a fictional character’s image instead, they want you to believe.

  • “Currently, man is waging war against nature. If he wins, he is lost”. – Hubert Reeves (not known as Saint Hubert)
  • “Wrong is wrong even if everybody is doing it. Right is right even if no one is doing it.” – Augustine of Hippo (also known as Saint Augustine)

#education #personaldevelopment #ReligionAndBelief #word

Ciriaco de’ Pizzecolli

By In You

According to the internet, he is considered the father of archeology.

Talking about Ciriaco de’ Pizzecolli (born 633 years ago / died 572 years ago). He walked the Earth when the sun, according to the religionists, was barely a few thousand years old.

Much water has gone under the bridge since. Though time is relative, 600 years is relatively long. The religionists may have reluctantly changed their beliefs since then, partly because of the work of this other word-user my yesterday’s post was about, Hasan Ibn Al-Haytham.

Back to Ciriaco de’ Pizzecolli. I didn’t walk the Earth when Ciriaco did, but given the dominance of the Catholic church at the time — around 600 years ago was the golden age of the Catholic inquisition — I image he knew it was safe to believe what the Catholics preached, or else. Despite this, he dared to question what they said, hence decided to become what he is now, considered the father of archeology.

As a result of that decision, interest in the past was new 600 years ago, and the Catholics jumped onto Ciriaco’s band wagon hoping it wouldn’t provide fresh insights, heresy among the religionists. They hoped instead archeology would confirm their version of what happened before they were born.

They predicted de’ Pizzecolli would find the nails on Jesus’ cross, rediscover the stone rolled away from the his tomb, and locate the angel or angels announcing to a select group of females God’s son had risen from the dead.

When it turned out the opposite happened, that fresh insights were gained instead, the Catholics bailed out in a hurry.

Be as it may, interest in the past has grown to levels unimagined in Ciriaco de’ Pizzecolli times.

The rest, as the saying goes, is a different story, including the story I’m the author of, the story of words.

TAKEAWAY

Why is archeology not pastology?
What has arch got to do with past?

Near as I can tell, only the grammarians know and I’m still waiting to meet my first one face to face.
When I do, I’ll ask.

How about you, have you met your first grammarian yet?

#futurism #HistoryAndFaith #personaldevelopment #word

Ciriaco de’ Pizzecolli

CIRIACO DE’ PIZZICOLLI

According to the internet, he is considered the father of archeology.

Talking about Ciriaco de’ Pizzecolli (born 633 years ago / died 572 years ago). He walked the Earth when the sun, according to the religionists, was barely a few thousand years old.

Much water has gone under the bridge since. Though time is relative, 600 years is relatively long. The religionists may have reluctantly changed their beliefs since then, partly because of the work of this other word-user my yesterday’s post was about, Hasan Ibn Al-Haytham.

Back to Ciriaco de’ Pizzecolli. I didn’t walk the Earth when Ciriaco did, but given the dominance of the Catholic church at the time — around 600 years ago was the golden age of the Catholic inquisition — I image he knew it was safe to believe what the Catholics preached, or else. Despite this, he dared to question what they said, hence decided to become what he is now, considered the father of archeology.

As a result of that decision, interest in the past was new 600 years ago, and the Catholics jumped onto Ciriaco’s band wagon hoping it wouldn’t provide fresh insights, heresy among the religionists. They hoped instead archeology would confirm their version of what happened before they were born.

They predicted de’ Pizzecolli would find the nails on Jesus’ cross, rediscover the stone rolled away from the his tomb, and locate the angel or angels announcing to a select group of females God’s son had risen from the dead.

When it turned out the opposite happened, that fresh insights were gained instead, the Catholics bailed out in a hurry.

Be as it may, interest in the past has grown to levels unimagined in Ciriaco de’ Pizzecolli times.

The rest, as the saying goes, is a different story, including the story I’m the author of, the story of words.

TAKEAWAY

Why is archeology not pastology?
What has arch got to do with past?

Near as I can tell, only the grammarians know and I’m still waiting to meet my first one face to face.
When I do, I’ll ask.

How about you, have you met your first grammarian yet?

#futurism #HistoryAndFaith #personaldevelopment #word